David and Solomon Essay Example for Free

David and Solomon Essay In 1 Kings 9:12-13, Hiram, the lord of Tire, is portrayed as not satisfied with the sort of towns that King Solomon has given him. Maybe expecting for something that would have approached all the pine, cedar and gold that he gave Solomon, Hiram interrogated the King concerning the towns that he got. Then again, 2 Chronicles 8:2 just notices that Solomon reproduced the towns that Hiram had given, after which he settled the Israelites in these towns. Following the sections in 1 Kings 9:10-28, Hiram named the twenty towns in Galilee he got from Solomon as the Land of Cabul. The word â€Å"Cabul† implies ‘what doesn't please’ in Phoenician. The way that the Hiram named the land Solomon has given him â€Å"Cabul† proposes that, in fact, Hiram was not satisfied at all with the signals of the King. Maybe the motivation to Hiram’s disappointed response is that he gave all the pine, cedar and gold that Solomon needed uniquely to get twenty grounds which sometimes fell short for his taste. It may have been the situation that Hiram had exclusive requirements consequently of his motions to Solomon. Then again, 2 Chronicles 8:2 recommends that Hiram gave the towns to Solomon rather than Solomon as far as anyone knows giving Hiram the twenty towns in Galilee in 1 Kings 9:11. In 2 Chronicles 8:2, it is referenced that Solomon â€Å"rebuilt† the urban areas he got, inferring that the urban communities were not in acceptable condition. In a similar entry, we are likewise informed that Solomon inevitably positioned the Israelites to live in those revamped urban communities. The section seems to point us that Solomon was a lord who was out to build up the lacking and to grow his territory through the assets he collected from his triumphs. In addition, Solomon’s men along with Hiram’s mariners got back from Ophir conveying 400 and fifty abilities of gold to Solomon in 2 Chronicles 8:17-18. Unexpectedly, 1 Kings 9:28 portrays a similar armada of men cruising to Ophir yet just conveying 400 and twenty gifts of gold to Solomon. The disparity in the measure of gold conveyed recommends in any event two thoughts: one is that Solomon was either exceedingly triumphant or not in his adventures and two is that he was either an all around regarded ruler or not by his subjects. Generally, the records gave in 2 Chronicles 8:1-18 recommend that Solomon was a ruler who was exceedingly triumphant to such an extent that Hiram was constrained to give him urban areas which Solomon then modified. Then again, the records gave in 1 Kings 9:10-28 propose that Solomon was a ruler who, when all is said in done, didn't give the fitting duty to individuals who expected much from him insomuch as he was a ruler who the regal subjects can undoubtedly take from due to some degree to an absence of trustworthiness and regard. I think the two records contrast concerning the depictions of the character and the activities of Solomon in view of varying recognitions towards Solomon. I think the consideration of the disappointed response of Hiram in 1 Kings 9:12-13 may recommend that a few people saw Solomon at the hour of his standard as somebody who could just think less about how others may see him and respond against his activities. In actuality, the exclusion of Hiram’s response in 2 Chronicles 8:2 may recommend that how individuals saw Solomon as to his activities was unessential since he may have been viewed as an honorable ruler who accommodated his subjects their necessities. When all is said in done, the depiction of Solomon’s reign in 1 Kings isn't just â€Å"based on an assortment of sources with an alternate provenance† yet in addition â€Å"displays hints of various phases of redaction† (Talshir, p. 233) or the blend of various source writings, subsequently proposing that the distinctions in the records can be to a great extent ascribed to their particular authors. In both 2 Samuel 8:1-18 and 1 Chronicles 18:1-17, the triumphs of David in the entirety of his wars are described. In the entirety of the wars uncovered in the two records, David is depicted as a capable pioneer who is a lot of fit for attacking regions and still not neglecting to make contributions to God, for example, the gold and silver adventures. The two records concur that the Lord helped David any place he went, showing that the Lord was satisfied with the endeavors of David. Be that as it may, one significant contrast between the two records is that, in 2 Samuel 8:2, David is portrayed as having had the option to vanquish the Moab powers which was trailed by the execution the couple of remaining Moabites. In the determination procedure, the Moabites were made to lie on the ground in a line and the individuals who were inside two lines were executed while those in the third length were allowed to live under the standard of David. Obviously, nothing about the procedure of the execution was notice all through 1 Chronicles 18:1-17. The consideration of the depiction of the execution of the Moabites in 2 Samuel 8:2 gives an unpleasant picture of how David was as far as anyone knows heartless towards his vanquished subjects. The entry gives us the feeling that, despite the fact that David was caring enough to â€Å"randomly† permit a portion of the Moabites to live, he was in any case a pioneer and a warrior who indicated little kindness towards the individuals who have endure the invasion of his armed forces. The apparently definite record of the execution of the Moabites makes a ghostly mental condition, showing up as a visual update that David was a victor who showed his position and force with little kindness. But then, David is as yet depicted in a similar entry as a standing hireling of the Lord who always remembers to give his contributions to God. It connotes that, since the Lord helped David any place he didn't go anything, can remain against the way and the attitude of David. Generally, apparently the situation of the author in 2 Samuel 8:1-18 is that David was a sincere worker of the Lord while being a savage vanquisher who can without much of a stretch end the lives of his vanquished subjects as indicated by his will. Then again, the author of 1 Chronicles 18:1-17 implies that David was honored by the Lord and that he was a pioneer who devoutly served and offered contributions to the Lord without the trace of savagery uncovered in 2 Samuel 8:2. The two records contrast essentially on the grounds that David, I believe, was a ruler detested in his time by the individuals who became casualties of his military activities. It is in this way to be expected that in any event one record relating to David’s military advances gave a few insights concerning how individuals were executed relying upon the choice of David. Be that as it may, the individuals who considered David to be an honest ruler and the individuals who profited by his triumphs are progressively disposed to put David on an increasingly positive respect. Roddy L. Braun recommends that the Chroniclerâ€the author of the book of Chroniclesâ€presents David’s majesty as â€Å"greeted by the blended large numbers of Israel in with prompt and eager unanimity† (Braun, p. 503) in contrast to the individual scholars of Samuel and Kings. Such varieties in compositions can scarcely be accommodated on the whole and that the best way to stay away from the endless loop that can start from the inability to accommodate the records, as Sara Japhet recommends, is â€Å"by considering the issue from its positive aspectsâ€not based on what is precluded, yet based on what is existent† (Japhet, p. 206). Subsequently, it isn't really the situation that the distinctions in the records imply that one record is valid and the other isn't. While Solomon might be depicted in Kings uniquely in contrast to Chronicles or while David might be depicted in Samuel uniquely in contrast to Chronicles, the distinctions may not basically imply the honesty or misrepresentation of both of the records. Or maybe, the nearness of extra subtleties in the each record gives more understanding into the lives of Kings David and Solomon. Works Cited Braun, Roddy L. â€Å"Solomonic Apologetic in Chronicles. † Journal of Biblical Literature 92. 4 (1973): 503-16. Japhet, Sara. â€Å"Conquest and Settlement in Chronicles. † Journal of Biblical Literature 98. 2 (1979): 205-18. Talshir, Zipora. â€Å"The Reign of Solomon really taking shape. † Vetus Testamentum 50. 2 (2000): 233-49